ORIGINAL: Rifle Loony
ORIGINAL: bigcountry
ORIGINAL: Rifle Loony
And you are one of those that insist it's harder than it really is...
End of story.
But, people putting fancy names on like OCW doesn't make it sound harder? Man, its been around for decades. Just some fool tryed to claim it calling it OCW. Why do you insist on calling it OCW? Your not trying to claim this technique are you?
Why would I want to do that?
What's your problem with what name it's called?
What would you want me, or anyone who uses it, to call it so you'll stop whining about it being called a fancy name?
Is there anothername for it?
I could type out "Optimal Charge Weight" eact time but why would you expect me to do that?
Are you one of those Internet Experts that troll threads just to make some lame complaint?
Why are you against the principles of the system?
HUH....??
I am not any of those. I just can't figure out why you are calling a method thats been around for decades OCW. There are not too many out there that referr to this ladder method as OCW. Is it like the in thing to call it this now. Its just rather lame.
Rifle, lets take a good look here. You come on here with a whole 45 posts, and you call me a troll? Your rude and obnoxious and acting like a child and I have a feeling your only 18 or so. Why all the negativity just because noone agrees with you?
I am not against the system, but your talking to a crowd here that knows better and knows its limitations.
You wanted to have an intelligent conversation. Lets see some simulation data. Have you modeled this principle in matlab, or C? Lets see how intelligent you are. Impress us dont' just insult us!
Show us how good you are, don't just tell us.