RE: Cam and a half? Hoyt versus Mathews?
I shoot a Q2XL and absolutely love it, finally got it all set up with CXL 250s and close to 5grs/lb and getting 273fps with a 27" draw length and at 66lbs. But anyways, I heard the other day that Hoyt came out with the cam and a half so that they dont have to pay royalty to Mathews, since all companies that produce single cam bows have to pay Mathews royalty. Anyone heard any such thing? Makes sense to me if it' s true since Mathews has a patent and makes other pay them that Hoyt wouldnt want to do that...
Shawn