MA Jay, I admit I erroneously included the wrong picture for the information I provided regarding the P&Y WR. But there' s a big difference between that and this. First off there are many small details included regarding this animal allegedly taken in Washington, where it was shot, the weight, the score, an update on the score, how the animal was harvested, who harvested the animal who did the calling etc. They seemed certain about the facts, otherwise why state them. Toss into the equation that the story was specific to the picture on the page and you see why I have a problem with this. If all the facts regarding the story are false, as it appears they are, why would the picture have any validity. It' s not like there was an honest mistake. The whole story was about this cat.