Again, you left out something very important! First, thegraphs I could finddid not include a firm dpsm number but feel free to post one. Also, the areaused for that particular graph was NOT 100% forested but contained a substantial amount offields. Thats a vast difference to much of the overbrowsed heavily forested areas in 2G and 2F as well as many other areas with similar poor habitat.

Again, apples and oranges and statements of incomplete fact. Maybe you should run for office. If you arent deaddeer, beenthere, ddearetc under a new alias, you sure are beginning to sound like his clone.