I THINK THE WAY PEOPLE HUNT IS DETERMENED WHERE THEY HUNT SIMPLY BECAUSE ITS EASY 2 PASS DEER IF U C THEM ALL THE TIME,BUT FOR MOST OF US ITS A STRUGGLE JUST 2 GET 2 THE WOODS SO WE GET WHAT WE CAN SO DONT KNOCK US
No one is knocking anyone pal. I was inquiring so that I could simply understand better. As far as the "for most of us its a struggle...," I go to school 2 hours away from my hunting area and skipping class to hunt is out of the question at my university. Weekends? If I'm lucky. I wouldn't judge another until you've walked in their shoes.
There is not a single hunter on this forum that needs the meat,if you can buy a computer and have the internet you can buy a cow. I am not a farmer so i do not "havest" deer. I and all of you are killers, predators. If you heat dosent pound for a spike the same as a 10 point, take up golf. If u choose to take only mature deer great. So stoptelling other hunters there wrong for shooting a young deer.
In my attempt to be more politically correct and more friendly with the anti-hunting community, I believe harvest is a better suited word. In your basic ecology course you will also learn that in population dynamic models harvest or take is also the chosen vernacular in dealing with many predators as well. Again, I don't believe has told anyone how to hunt and that was made clear initially. Furthermore, you're kidding yourself if you think you get as excited for a spike as you would if a booner were to come walking through the woods. Haha, just reread your last sentence one more time, I don't believe anyone has said it is wrong, perhaps you are inferring such a thing but it was never implied.