You can make statistics dance the jitter bug if you want, especially with a tiny non-representative sample like this one. If you want to read it from one perspective, then two thirds of those responding do not support banning hunting with dogs. From the other perspective two thirds do not approveof letting dog hunting continue in its current form.Of course, it is not clear if the respondents wanting change insist on mandating it or if theyjusthave varying degrees of support forthe idea that some changewould be nice but not necessarily mandatory.