Guys, thank you all for the replies and please, feel free to question me because I thought it sounded fishy and I was there!

The only reason I would think that the chrono is correct is because I shot,y bowthrough my chrono at home and got the same results that I got out of theirs. Granted, that is a 1 point calibration, but still, same same you know what I mean?

I am not sure about the mods on the Ally to be honest. I just completely forgot to ask b/c I was so shocked after shooting the GTO that I was lost for words.

I understand that the improvements are not only speed, but my bow shoots good by me so unless I can get a lot more speed I just can't justify that much $ right now.

Matt, yes the Ultra II has a 6" or 6 1/4" brace height and was the 2nd fastest bow Mathews produced in 2001 or 2002 (I just can't remember) when I bought it. However, I am 99% sure (but I have been wrong before) that at that time it was rated for 300 fps or just over. I know that the Black Max was much faster but what help that really is I have no idea. The low brace height is not a problem for me. I couldn't win a national shoot I am sure, but I can hit a basketball 90+% of the time at 60 yards when I have been practicing (that means not in March).

Maybe it just is what it is, but Rob posted some #'s from his 82nd which I am 100% sure were correct that blew everything here out of the water by miles and if I am correct the draw length was 28.5" which I wouldn't think would make that much of a difference. He did have a little more poundage and less arrow weight, but it was close and the fps was close to 35-40fps more. Should I just go somewhere else and try again????