HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .270-308 Do we need one?
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2008, 08:17 AM
  #47  
eldeguello
Giant Nontypical
 
eldeguello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Posts: 6,270
Default RE: .270-308 Do we need one?

ORIGINAL: bigbulls

Yes, I agree that for what ever reason bullet manufacturers tend to make bullets in .264 and .284 diamaters more aerodynamic than any other bullet diameters. I don't know why they do this but they do.
Perhaps because to make the larger calibers as aerodynamic as the smaller ones, it takes a considreably heavier bullet to get the same SD. This would be a requirement if the form factors were identical. This would then add recoil, if these bigger bullets were to be driven to the same velocity levels.... For example, a 160-grain Speer .284 PSPBT has a sectional density of .283, and a B.C. of .556. But their .308 bullet with the same B.C. has a SD of .301, and weighs 200 grains. However, it is a flatbase, (no BT), so it would be a little better if it had a boattail. It could therefore weigh less. Perhaps 190 grains or so.
eldeguello is offline