RE: .270-308 Do we need one?
Thanks for understanding. If you remember, I agreed with you that any difference isn't going to amount to anything anybody will notice in the field at normal hunting ranges. I was just trying to point out that in the common weights listed, .277 bullets tend to have lower S.D.'s, and that most of thetime the most aerodynamic bullets available tend to be .264 or.284 caliber. I don't think this is too much to ask for some agreement on. All of this was in an attempt to provide evidence of why I believe there isn't a NEED for a .27-08, which was my answer to the original post. I won't post on this again, as I doubt anything will be resolved from it anyway.