ORIGINAL: HNI_Christine
So Quik, which show or hunting celeb trys to pass them self off as being the best hunters in the world?
Some people find a dizty blonde with big boobs entertaining, some folks find big bucks being shot with a rifle over food plots entertaining. Some shows throw little 'info' bits in there. Sometimes it's useful, sometimes it's not. I think if you watch hunting shows to learn something, you're in trouble. Watch them to be entertained, if you're not.. turn the channel.
Let's be honest, it not that hard to hang a treestand where the deer will pass by. If we could hunt on the Kisky farm we'd probably shoot big bucks too. Most of us don't have that farm, the time, the camera crew, the money, the devotionand the connections to have our own show. So we're not celebs. So what. Are you jealous?Are you mad because some people do give the 'celebs' more credit than they should. (that's what it sounds like to me) So then really, your issue is with the sheeplike groupies. and if that's the case go watch an Obama rally. That should really get you going.
Oh, I agree, hunting isn't rocket science. But my beef is that there are much better candidates out there, with an incomparable amount of knowledge - and those people are sitting at home watching on TV while Tiffany shoots another big buck on a big farm with lots of big targets.
IfParis Hiltonstarted playing pro football, I'd still watch, b/c I like watching pro football... But that isn't to say that she wouldn't be damaging the quality of the product at the end of the day.
Look, it's this simple: Pro hockey can't get any better, b/c the best players in the world are already laced up when the puck drops.
Pro football can't get any better, b/c the best players in the country are already on the field.
Pro hunting could get a lot better if they would justput the best players in the game.