HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - CAST BULLETS
Thread: CAST BULLETS
View Single Post
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:01 PM
  #12  
HEAD0001
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
Default RE: CAST BULLETS

ORIGINAL: mcawful

ORIGINAL: HEAD0001

Personally I believe the bullet will expand just fine, and I do not want my bullet to be marked til it is fired.
Why not? If it doesexpand ( or obturate)upon firing, won't any marks made at loading be a moot point?
By definiton, isn't obturation a deformation of the bullet material?

I agree with you to a point. First of all it is the base of the bullet that expands at ignition. The marking will be along the whole length of the bullet if the bullet is oversized to the bore. So you are affecting the entire bullet, not just the base. Also you are affecting the bullet going in and coming out, so you have affected your bullet twice instead of once.

I also agree with Underclocked about the purest lead(as possible). but only when using a slip fit bullet. Or a bullet that is the same as bore size. If you use soft lead and your bullet is even slightly over sized then you are deforming your bullet when you push in down the barrel.

As all of you know, you will get different accuracy from different rifles shooting the same bullets. You guy's know that accuracy is inherent in the rifle, and not necessarily the projectile.

I have and still do cast a lot oflead bullet's. In MZ's, BP loads in cartridge rifles, and smokeless loads. I am only stating that I have found that the relationship of the bullet to bore size is more important(in my experience) than the particular alloy I am using. I have never noticed a difference in performance on game between WW and pure lead. They both work well. And it is easier and cheaper for me to get WW. If I could get better performance from pure lead, then I would definitely pay the difference.

And I will admit that the Half Nutz comment was a hoot. I am still laughing about that one. Tom.
HEAD0001 is offline  
Reply