HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Elitist attitude
View Single Post
Old 03-01-2008 | 11:32 AM
  #144  
millerhunter13's Avatar
millerhunter13
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
From: Where the big deer are from, seminole county FL
Default RE: Elitist attitude

ORIGINAL: Big Duane

It is alsomore demanding to be proficient, making the outcomes so much more worth it. The more you put in, the more you get out type of thing.
is that a banket view ? meaning, what you hold yourslef to, do you also hold others to ?


burniegoeasily yep, you nailed my conflict, I know what you're saying. However, shooting an ACS with carbons is almost the same "shooting" as a self bow with cane shafts - a difference of FPS but other than that, the shooting remains the same doesn't it ?


Matt / PA look back at yourself over the past 5 years. Where you came from as a compound shooter, and where you are now. What you shoot now is dramtically more difficult than a compound. I've bet you $$ you could pick up anyones compound right now, and within minutes shoot better at 50 yards than you can with your stick bow at 25 yards. Compounds are THAT much better, they're designed to be easy, and very shootable, thats why most bowhunters use them.

Which leads me to this thinking - is bowhunting suppose to be that easy ? Compounds are just a wee bit harder than crossbows, there is a solid argument that compounds are actually EASIER, because of their quietness, light mass weight and speeds all combines into one.

Is that what bowhunting is suppose to be ? Easy ? Why or why not ?

When comparing self bows to a Widow, you can still see its very similar. Compounds and crossbows are radically different. Like comparing an 1880's flintlock with loose powder, patches and balls with a 2008 TC Encore,stainless steel, plastic stock,pellets, shotgun primers and 3x12x55 leopuld scope - are they really both muzzleloaders ?


Because I choose trad bows doesn’t make me better than those who don’t.
Why doesn't it ?

If you choose a more difficult path, shouldn't it be recognized as such ? Why shouldn't there be a hard line distinction between the difficulty in weapons used ? A compound bow and the hunting that comes from it is NOT the same accomplishments as a recurve/longbow hunt and the hunting that comes from it.

Its not, not one example can I think of that if you remove the compound and replace with a stick bow does the situation become much more difficult, and like you said, the rewards also increase.


Yes, I understand each persons own challenges - its not about that. Its about what is and isn't more difficult, about the continuing progress of technology to easier and better, and the affects it has on bowhunting as a whole.






you said that compounds are just a wee bit easier then crossbows, your so wrong their a crossbow is alot easier, it dosnt take the fine tuning like a compound does, and with a crossbow there really isnt form like with a compound or trad bow, a compound is easier, but not everyone has the time to put in to trad archery, like me i am just a kid, i dont have every minute for that i have school, work, my truck, all of these things, so a compound would be better, and bow hunting is bowhunting, trad hunting is like a .410 you have to be able to get a deer in closer and you have to be able to make the shot, the compound is like a 12 ga. alot more range, and is easier to hit a deer with, both are still hard to do.
millerhunter13 is offline  
Reply