This particular debate between me and you is not for an actual court decision....that's what I meant.
I realize that. I made the aboveanalogy because, IMO,it clearly shows the posture you are taking on this issue. I find that posture to be anti-productive for hunting (in general). You mean to tell me that you would rather not give up ten hours of your time and ten dollars from your pocket?It's a smallprice to pay, don't you think,to keep 80% of the publicfrom voting against you?
I have four guys coming from England in September.Each and every one of themwould give up10,000 times thatmuch for the priviledge to bow hunt in their own country. Seems the Queen's swans and deer were running around with arrows, affixed with feild tips, through thier bodies. Rather than educate the individuals, they simply banned all bowhunting. Go figure...