Aha. That explains it. I was thinking dual personalities there Bowfanatic, but that clears it up. Getting back to this thread, I wholeheartedly agree with Pinwheels and others thinking that twos can be tuned more precisely and shot to a higher level of accuracy. If I were going to shoot spots, and only spots, thats what Id shoot. I have seen Pin post that for hunting we should strive to be as accurate as possible. I of course agree with that. Point being where do you draw the line. If we were truly trying to be the best we could, wed go into the woods with our 24 inch stabilizers, out v bars,our highly micro adjustable Tox or Surelock sight bars with the four power scope, and we would only shoot with true back tension releases, and then only using perfect form. Basically for the utmost in accuracy, wed use our highly accurate target setups.Problem is that isnt realistic. Makes as much sense as using your 14 lb. 1/4" m.o.a. benchrest rifle to chase elk.You have to find a compromise that gets the job done. I guess my point being, how much less accurate is a one compared to a two overall. A quarter inch a.m.o.a. A half inch. Big deal. Anytime you set up a hunting bow its a compromise. A compromise between accuracy, ease of use, and fragility.