I'm really not very good at giving reviews. I know what I like and dislike when it comes to archery equipment, but I am not good at decsribing this to others. I will try to give you some of my opinions though. First, I will say that I love both bows. They are both very easy to shoot. I like the narrow grip of the Hoyt better than the wider grip of the Q2. I find it easier to get the grip in the same spot on my hand with the Hoyt's narrow grip. The Q2 feels a little better to me when I draw it. It has more of a solid feel at full draw. The Hoyt is much quieter when shot. It makes almost no noise when shot. The Mathews is quiet, but not nearly as quiet as the Hoyt. I will say I use a Vibracheck stabilizer on both, and it has alot to do with how quiet the bows are. It is a great stabilizer. Both bows are much louder when I take it off. One thing that I really like about the Hoyt is the Versa cam. It is unbelievably simple to adjust the draw and let off to suit you. The Mathews is a little more compact and might be better than the Hoyt for treestand hunting. This is simply because of the shorter ATA length. My Q2 is really bad about tearing up the serving on the cable and it appears the Hoyt is going to be the same way. It is already seperating in the short time I have had the bow, although I have shot it alot. It is really no big deal though. I don't mind changing strings and cables every year if needed. I have shot the Hoyt enough now that I am getting better groups with it than I do with the Q2. I know it is because the grip feels better to me. I love both bows and I would not want to sell either one. I need them both. I will say this. As much as I like the Q2, if I had the new world record typical Whitetail standing in front of me at 30 yards, I would want the Cybertec in my hands. I hope this answered a few of your questions.