ORIGINAL: Killer_Primate
I wonder why they would strongly oppose "Requires the revocation of the hunting license for the current and the next hunting seasons as well as the forfeiture of the firearm or bow and arrow of any person who is convicted of carrying such weapons on another person's property while he is retrieving his hunting dogs". What could this mean? Does this mean they support carrying weapons while simply retrieving thier dogs?
I can see the problem with that. If they want to change the penalty for trespassing it shouldn't just single out dog hunters.
They could just change it to this.
"Requires the revocation of the hunting license for the current and the next hunting seasons as well as the forfeiture of the firearm or bow and arrow of any person who is convicted of carrying such weapons on another person's property"