ORIGINAL: quiksilver
Bruce: I got lambasted last year for suggesting that the same tactic should be legalized for hunting whitetails in the U.S. Granted, I didn't call it "green hunting" because I was unfamiliar with the term... I believe the thread was called "Catch and Release Hunting" and all the HNI "inside-the-box thinkers" were peeing themselves with anger and vitriol over the whole thing. No surprise really.
I mean, you see a nice,but still immature buck - you take him down with your sedative arrow, take a few field photos and measurements - have your taxi build you a set of replica antlers to puton the mount. Maybe shoot him again next year.
Isn't that the ultimate in "letting them go so they can grow?" I mean, if it's SUCH a great idea for fish, I don't know how it could possibly be that bad an idea, as applied to mammals.
Funny how I always get labeled as crazy - but then we see these things actually happening (past or present). Amazing how that works. [:-]
The difference here, I think, is that they needed to sedate this rhino for "legitimate" (for want of a better word) reasons and weren't doing just so the guy could get it on the ground. I have looked on the SCI website for any reference to this green hunt business but have not found it yet. At this point I am assuming, maybe wrongly, that there is some need to sedate the animal in the green hunt scenario which would make it quite a bit different than the catch and release deal.