ORIGINAL: GMMAT
My point is and still is, if both archers can hit the deer, why is one "harder" than the other.
Rob, buddy.....I have to ask you a question.
If "Bob" works 30 yrs in his field and works his way up through the ranks.....from the mail room....to the executive vice president's corner office...........and "Dan" is the owner of the company's son....and goes from the frat house to the other EVP position........
Which way is "harder"?
You have to be able to see the differnece. As a guitar player.....I kinda see it like learning to play a song.....vs turning on the ipod. They're both still just "songs", right?
Jeff, that is the shooting aspect not the hunting aspect and this falls right back to my original question and reply. See below.
[blockquote]quote:
If you have not killed with sticks and stones you may not truly realize how hard bowhunting really is.[/blockquote]
That was a great post minus that one line quoted above. If a guy can hit his mark, 10 out of 10 at 20 yards regardless of weapon, it's not harder one way or another, it's about getting the animal at that 20 yards, not hitting him.
Not one time did I say that shooting a traditional bow is not harder, that's obvious but it doesn't make the HUNT harder, just the shooting aspect of it.