I'm not too familiar with the landscapes of either Alaska or Sweden, but is 100% of alaska able to support moose populations? What I'm saying is the numbers alone can't speak for themselves. If there were supposed to be 2 million moose in Alaska, I'm not sure there's anything anybody could do about it short of major habitat destruction. There wouldn't be any of that in Alaska or anywhere else in the United States would there? Is there such a problem w/ anti's in Sweden? Besides, think about it, moose are relatively large animals, eating relatively large amounts of food each day, Imagine the land mass and vegetation required to support 2 million moose. Alaska is a big state, but it isn't that big. There are way more factors than just the game department's management.