ORIGINAL: bigcountry
ORIGINAL: HowardRoark
Paul,
Please read the last paragraph of my post again. The most transparent was of attacking WHAT a person said when they do not have a lucid response is to attack HOW they said it (including spelling). Can you now understand that have the inability to engage in meaningful conversation versus slinging insults as proven by your response?
If you read my first post and do not find yourself as being described, then ignore it, it does not pertain to you individually. However, if you find yourself included in the generalities I made, then you have a rationale for debate.
Howard
VA, there was several meaningful responses, that I and Ridge put out there. You failed to actually respond to any. But I really don't blame you. You went after the low hanging fruit at that point.
holy crap....guy goes to bed after a bourbon and couple of posts, comes home from work and finds "posts gone wild" . Jimany crickets, i've got 20 people up my butt and have'nt been kissed. Theres like 35 responces. Good Lord, I tried to pay a compliment to a traditional archery guy and get ridiculed because I havent shot as long as he has. A simple "hey, keep practicing" would have been nice. Instead Im told I cant be a member of "his" club. All you ML guys realize your huntign during "his" season, and to top it off, he likes to smokepole. And I guess since he knows everthing, and now ive taken on another name. I think you spent too much time driving around that beltway. Then comes Howard. I kinda like him.If you read between the lines, he makes sense. And I guess the only hunting in the world is whitetaildeer cause thats all people want to talk about.
The fact is that about every post is about who's eqipment is better and why. Now maybe you see the point of my first response. I havent heard yet about time with family. Guess its not about that, just guns and deer.
how does Howard like that one?