ORIGINAL: HowardRoark
Paul,
Please read the last paragraph of my post again. The most transparent was of attacking WHAT a person said when they do not have a lucid response is to attack HOW they said it (including spelling). Can you now understand that have the inability to engage in meaningful conversation versus slinging insults as proven by your response?
If you read my first post and do not find yourself as being described, then ignore it, it does not pertain to you individually. However, if you find yourself included in the generalities I made, then you have a rationale for debate.
Howard
VA, there was several meaningful responses, that I and Ridge put out there. You failed to actually respond to any. But I really don't blame you. You went after the low hanging fruit at that point.