HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Your thoughts on energy and range...
View Single Post
Old 12-18-2007 | 05:23 PM
  #13  
gleason.chapman
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Your thoughts on energy and range...

ORIGINAL: HEAD0001

I do not put alot of credibility on "kinetic energy's"---"killing ability". A 22-250 at 4,000 fps has more KE than a 45-70 at 1200 fps, but I sure know which one does a better job of putting game down. There are so many variables involved that it can get very confusing. If you step up to a 165 grain 30 caliber bullet at 3200 fps-then all of a sudden the KE becomes a factor again.

MZ's have the distinct advantage of making a big, clean hole. I think the wound channel of just the bullet is all that is necessary. That is why some hunter's use a 45-70 at 1200 fps. They say they can eat right upto the hole, and as Cayugad said-it is a big hole!!!

IMO as long as you have enough down range energy to assure penetration to the vitals, then you have enough energy to assure a clean kill. How else could a 45-70 at 1200fps kill a buffalo at 1,000 yards. It does not take alot of velocity or energy to get a pure lead conical to expand. And if you are shooting conical's just remember(again as Cayugad said) you have a 1/2 inch hole to start with. Tom.
Agreed, because it got into the vitals and there is enough energy to do major damage because the bullet is so large. Chap
gleason.chapman is offline  
Reply