Yes, Paul - I looked at it. I mean, it does a good job of showing your speed degradation and energy loss downrange- but the trajectory numbers are useless, since you can't set the "zero" at any certain fixed distance. Here again, I'm not sure what you're trying to argue about or show me.

I'mtalking about trajectory,and you're telling me aboutenergy retention. 2 totally different things.

I am not wrong. My numbers matched the OnTarget numbers that Archer58 ran... And they match my real-world testing. I don't know what else to tell ya. I'm sure it bothers you that my happy little chart is indeed correct (within an acceptable range) - but I can't change that.

If you want, I can go back and edit the datareplace it with numbers that Irandomly pick from a hat- then that way you and Artie canfinally relax nowthat my happy little chartwillno longer beaccurate.