I normally would stay out of such a thread... fear I guess. But this thread has gone on far too long to ignore anymore. It is very clear that many on here do not understand what is actually going on with the scent lok trial.. it is also clear that many don't even know who's sueing who?

For the heated debatees... I do wear scent-lok and enjoy a rigorous routine of scent eliminating products. Do I believe they eliminate 100% of my scent.. No.. I do not. I was not, nor have ever been, COMPLETELY nieve! But I do believe in increasing my odds in the woods each and every time I go into them. If Scent Lok increases my odds of killing a whitetail from 250-1 to 249-1... I'll GLADLY take those odds... Thank You.

About the trial.. it is sad really. Five Minnesota no-name hunters are the ones filing the suit. If it stands they will stand to make MUCH MUCH money. It is that reason and that reason alone I implore you to reconsider your stance on being "happy" a company is ever being sued. They are claiming the product does not work.. as they have NO BIG BUCKS to claim. They believe the product did not work 100% effectively.. they are sueing the advertising of Scent Lok really.. and nothing more. They even complain of conspiracy.. like Scent Lok took out Kennedy or something. The 5 hunters actually claim BPS, Gander, Cabelas and several others are ALL in it together!

It doesn't take a smart person to read through the countless pages of the lawsuit and realize what these 5 hunters are after. Now.. believe what you will on the subject of scent control and hunting. But if you are not using some sort of scent eliminating product you will never realize your potential as a hunter. period.