well, lubricious, some people would rather NOT know they spent their $$ on snake oil... which often explains why I never jump on any "latest/greatest" tech until its proven... for me, havin used activated carbon in my many salt/fresh water fish tanks over the years, i know for a fact that it doesn't last longer than a month or so before scent absorption is gone and i can't justify the cost of it for the short duration it would actually be useful, in a perfect world where it is delivered in a sealed container, this stuff might have more "cred" if it was also delivered in a 100% sealed container as well instead of just hangin on the rack absorbing scents from every thing around it... new gear every season? where can i sign my divorce papers...... imho, its cheaper and just as effective to simply practice good scent control on your body and standard clothing...

now, all that said, i'll change my opinion if someone can prove (other than anecdotal evidence, which seems to be the norm) that it actually does work better than the same amount of standard clothing with proper scent control practices... i'm open minded, but its gotta be shown to be effective... i like the concept, but have doubts about its effectiveness... especially when you attach a $ value to it... in the meantime, i'm gonna stay away from it until the results of the lawsuit are given as the plaintiff's will have to provide scientific evidence to the effectiveness of the scent blocker claims... should be interesting to see what the pro-scent blocker folks say if they lose the suit...