HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .300 win. mag. vs. .308
View Single Post
Old 11-28-2007 | 11:54 AM
  #10  
Folically Challenged
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Hamiltucky, OH
Default RE: .300 win. mag. vs. .308

ORIGINAL: ShatoDavis

ORIGINAL: ipscshooter

Split the difference. .30-06.

Seriously, consider what you will hunt, and where. Out to about 250 yards or so, a .308 will kill anything that you can kill with a .300 Win. Mag., without the recoil, noise, and expensive ammunition. You just need to pick your shots a little more carefully.
Logic?.... We dont need no stinkin logic!
Ditteuax! +1!

The way I look at it, if you don't think a .30-'06 (or .308) will kill the critters you're looking to kill, then you probably need something MUCH bigger: .338 WM, .375 H&H, and on up the food chain.

When I decided to get back into hunting, & to start with elk, I went through the whole caliber-selection quandary. I settled on the '06, figuring I didn't have the energy to master shooting a cartridge with vastly more powder in it.My .30-'06got my elk this Fall with no problems.

Turns out my outfitter has got a slot open fora '08 Shiras Moose Hunt in SE BC. I won't be getting another rifle for this hunt.

Now, if I were to chase coastal bears, then I'd probably pony-up for a .375. But I'll throw myself off that bridge when I come to it.

FC
Folically Challenged is offline  
Reply