if in 2008 Hunting was banned would you hunt ?
Lets pretend that ARA's make a very good lawsuit and in 2008 all fall deer hunting is suspended by law, its now illegal to kill deer
Would you still hunt ?
My reasoning is on the Political forum we're discussin non-res fees out west, and I said that at times I just felt like going out to Colorado, buy a small game tag but shoot a big bull if I see one ! I said that because it infuriates me the way non-res are treated in some states, then I got to thinking ...... would I REALLY hunt illegally ? I mean, what scenario would it have to be before I did it ? And if I can justify hunting because the ARA's banned it, why can't I justify hunting the elk out west when the DNR's of those states have all but canceled my big game hunting either by way of tag allotment, or just outpricing me ?
I know, far fetched as it is .... its something to ponder.
What if something radical happend, and compound were made illegal ? all in-line muzzleloaders ? All rifles (going to shotgun only) .... makes you THINK anyway huh ?