Come on you guy's! You can't compare Moultrie to Cuddeback. The trigger speedofthe Cudde smokes these Moultrie's. The picture quality is nothing like a cuddeback, with saying that the Moultrie's picture quality isn't that bad either but just doesn't compare to the cudde or to some of the other high buck cameras. The only downfall about a cudde is the price. There's no reason i guy should have to pay 450.00 for a camera, that is rediculous! The battery life isn't as good either but whats so hard about putting batteries in a camera once in a while.I have a cuddeback no-flash and the picture quality is unbeleivable and the video's are awesome as well. I'm not saying the moultries are no good, i'm just saying there's no way possible you can compare the 2, the cudde will take that prize 10 times out of 10 with quality and trigger speed.I think the reason so many people on hear put the cuddeback down and praise the Moultrie is because they can't afford a cuddeback. I couldn't afford one either but i bit the bullet and bought one. I have veryfew blank pictures to look at, i didn't buy a camera for the price, i bought it for the quality! You get what you pay for when buying these camera's.Just because a person can't afford a camera doesn't give you all a reason to say Moultrie is a better camera then the Cuddeback. Do what your finances allow you to do and be happy with what you got, in time maybe you can upgrade if thats what you want to do.Good luck in your purchase of your camera, its alot of fun looking at what you have in the woods and suprising as well!