HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Do you think Scent Lok is a must?
View Single Post
Old 08-20-2007 | 02:19 PM
  #187  
BigJ71's Avatar
BigJ71
Site Bouncer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Do you think Scent Lok is a must?

ORIGINAL: Arthur P

The military is engaged in searching for economical ways to reactivate their chem suits so they don't have to dispose of them and have apparently had some success. You can't access the full document on the net, but here is the abstract for methods of reactivating activated carbon clothing.

In the near future, chemical protective combat uniforms may be worn by Army personnel on a continuous basis. Activated carbon, the operative component, has diminished capacity for sorbing chemical agents after it has been exposed to dirt, sweat, cigarette smoke, engine exhaust, petroleum products and numerous other elements routinely present in the battlefield environment. This report summarizes the development of two nondestructive methods for cleaning and reactivating soiled chemical protective garments.

Complete reactivation was achieved when the aqueous i-propanol iodine displacement method of Manes, which removed all but pure hydrocarbon oil soils from the current overgarment Type III foam or Kynol activated carbon fiber material, was applied in nonaqueous solvent.

Subsequently, a nonaqueous solvent method that requires less handling was chosen in designing a truck-mounted system. It features non-agitative flow of methylene chloride and methanol around the chemical-protective garments suspended between ultrasonic transducers.

Both methods restore full sorptivity to the Type III foam liner. There is a one-time 10% loss of activated carbon without any loss of sorptivity. The volatile solvents are more easily removed, and can be economically recovered.
I don't know about y'all, but I'm fresh out of i-propynol iodine, methylene chloride, methanol and ultrasonic transducers, and who knows what the non-aqueous solvent was that they used. Odd that clothes dryers don't appear on the list, huh.
I don't think it's a must....and I don't think it works at all. Carbon will absorb oder, this has been scientifically proved so I feel the carbon suits work at first but are probably full by the time you or I buy them. Getting them re-activated or re-generated (same thing) is where I FEEL the general public is misled.

Read Arthur P's post and you will see that this very problem is trying to be tackled by the U.S. government for our troops. They are dealing with the same stuff...Activated Carbon.....and they are having trouble re-activating/re-generating them so what makes you think you can do it in your dryer?

I guess the military should just contact Scent-lok and be done with it...problem solved.

Until someone can prove to me that the suits can be re-generated/re-activated back to a usable state I won't waste my money on it.
BigJ71 is offline  
Reply