I AM mixed on my feelings for this issue. Of course as an avid outdoorsmen I support it, but I think there is merit in the arguement "so what?" I mean don't they have better issues to work on? I haven't been able to see the bill itself, but I would be suspicious as to what the underlying motive is. What exactly does this bill protect? They could still pass bills to ban every weapon in the state and then say but because of this bill you still have the right to hunt, WITH YOUR BARE HANDS! Good Luck! An extreme possibility, I know, but a possibility none the less. Therefore my enthusiasm is somewhat curbed.

I support it but don't hail it as a great step forward.

I would be interested in how anyone else feels.