kodiakhuntmaster
you make a good points in your replies
i was trying to get the point across that mat ward and er doctors was educational and entertainment for most reasons they could edit out alot of what you see but they dont
the hunting videos/shows are the same educational and entertaining i just fail to see where editing the shot by blurring the animal is of any use the antis are antis because they are uneducated in the reasons someone could be so passionate about killing a cute little furry animal that never done a thing to hurt them. the sport is contraversial and going to become more so as time goes on

some people will never share our passion for hunting. but i dont see how censoring it on TV is going to help. the "if you dont see it it dont happen" only works for a while then someone who works for PETA or another group is going to say "the sport is so violent they have to edit it for TV and your going to let your kids do that"

my point being if you give them an inch they are going to want two and when they get two they are going to want four etc...

we will never get everyone to agree censor or not to censor the shot but i am trying my best to keep it real

Edited by - jjt on 01/29/2003 22:46:23