HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Idaho reconsidering???
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2007 | 02:28 PM
  #9  
frontier gander
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,180
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

No need to get everyone riled up, I was just saying that if idaho feels that a sidelock is the way to go, they must know best. As for me not knowing about the scopes, i figured they allowed scopes during MLing season. Sabotloader posted a pic many many months ago with his omega and the deer he shot, i guess that may have been during rifle season? I dont agree with their bullet size crap, thats dumb. I think it should be a minimum bullet weight, not the diameter. Maybe idaho is doing exactly that, trying to scare away out of state hunters so the population will increase and better chances for more animals. Or they just feel its best to have it the traditional way? It could have been worse, They could have said flintlocks only like PA has. Anyone who has ever hunted with a flintlock knows how hard it is and theres much more that could go wrong and send you back to camp without any meat dragging behind you.
Yes, I do shoot inline and traditional. If colorado said traditional only, it wouldnt matter to me. I enjoy hunting with a sidelock or flintlock just the same. For me, its more of a challenge that i enjoy and want to experience more.

But i know noone wants to get into an argument, i personally am tired and done with arguing about something dumb.
It was just a misunderstanding is all. No need for anyone, you or me to get into an argument over something silly such as this topic.
frontier gander is offline  
Reply