ORIGINAL: Germ
Ok guys
If we are talking "Hertiage" hunting after Teddy Roosvelt days than Trophy Hunting is a part of hunting "Hertiage"
Do we all agree after the Teddy Roosvelt era is what we consider the "Hertiage" age of hunting? If so than Trophy hunting is a part of our hunting hertiage. So using the "Hertiage" word to make ones kill seem more noble is foolish to me.
I agree about Trophy Deer management 100% and it has gone to far. But I think pointing finger at "Trophy" hunters and saying they go against the "Hertiage" of hunting is 100% wrong.
I did not and do not point a finger at 'trophy hunters or trophy hunting' , just taking it too far. I have repeatedly stated that it in and of itself is not problematic, but rather that
the some that do go too far are not thinking long term nor do they seem to care about the long term, All that seems to matter is bigger and better, regardless of how it is achieved and the effects that it has on the big picture. These are the ones who have lost sight of huntings heritage and are, in effect, redefining it. Comprende?