Extrapolation, I see. I think it is called taking someones work and making it fit your agenda. I'll give Dr. Hulse a call and ask him if this study supports your claim that glucosamine is one of the best ways to prevent cruciate rupture in the opposite leg. After all, since he is the second author on the paper he should likely be able to speak on the subject don't you think?

Well designed scientific studies require no extrapolation. Peer review of papers allows no extrapolation to be done in the discussion. Extrapolation and anectdotal evidence are the same beast. So you were talking about your peer reviewed articles prior and now your extrapolating.

Still waiting for the link to that peer reviewed paper that backs up your claim about the CCL rupture. Somehow I'm not seeing how modulating the cartilage matrix is preventative for ligament rupture. Maybe you could explian the pathophysiology behind that.