Sky103. Actually I agree with some of what you say.
I don't think the DNR is perfect nor right all the time. But the points made at the being of this thread lack clear thought from my view point.
The writer objects to everything but gives no foundation of substance to support his attacks. They are not just opinions they are attacks.

Example:How is shooting deer from a helicopter with a shotgun by qualified marksmen a danger to other animals and people short of a helicopter crash. That is just Chicken Little the sky is falling nonsense.

Different states are addressing their problems with CWD in different ways that suit thier enviorment, degree of concern, extent of problem and game management style. WI has taken this aproach and is open to the public the entire way. Unfortunately not all the public is able to comprehend or understand the complexity of the situation.
I really don't have my head in the sand or up my butt. I do however believe that the DNR is interested in solving this problem, they are looking at every option and since no one on this board has come forward with any evidence that they are more qualified I'll keep following the ideas of the DNR and the experts on the subject.

Im always open to well thought out ideas and debate but that isn't happening here and I admit I got draw into the childish cr@p but I thought it was necessary to demonstrate the folly at the time.

Work hard and be true to yourself.
http://www.hunting-pictures.com/memb...kas/index.html