Scott....again...I don't care, really, what Wash is doing (or any of you). Does that mean I can't ask questions, any more (of course it doesn't....just pointing out the obvious absurdity of the claim)?

And it doesn't bother me at ALL what people from other states think about myherd. I'll listen to anything anyone that wants to speak intelligently has to say. What you (or anyone else) thinks about the way I hunt.....means very little to me as I go about my business. I'mgetting to be pretty comfortable in my own skin. Doesn't mean Iwon't listen to your views, at all, though.

Wash noted that he wished he could take more deer in his area.....but also hinted that he wouldn't be targeting a doe.....all the while admitting the lack of herd balance in his area. I asked him what the responsible thing to do was. Legitimate question? I thought so. it was designed to make him think a little....but when it comes down to it....I don'tcare WHAT he (or anyone else)shoots. Doesn't affect me, one bit.

I pointed out my own PREVIOUS "ignorance". I'm less ignorant, now. TRUE ignorance would be doing the same things I did last year over and over again.....and expecting a different result (i.e. a more "in balance" herd). And I didn't "assume" anything about Wash's situation. I listened to what HE told me about it.....and posed a question. "Ignorance" would be assuming I knew his situation. I don't. I took HIS word for it.