I've read a few debates over proficiency testing. I understand there are folks that are deadly in the woods, but fall apart trying to shoot a target with other's watching. I know there arearchers that will pass on a 20 yd shot because it's beyond their comfort zone, while there are others that won't think twice about a "hail mary" shot of 60+ yds. through the trees.

All the tests really prove, IMO, is you can hit a target at 20 yds. Doesn't mean you won't take a shot well beyond that range.

Putting everyone in the same hat isn't really fair in once sense, but on the other hand you have the choice of using the same equipment. I've been to tournaments where every "traditional" shooter was lumped into the same class--didn't matter if you were shooting an Olympic style recurve with carbon or a selfbow with rivercane. The guy with the self bow had the option of bringing a target style recurve.

I've also heard from one or two that had to take these tests that used a compound to qualify, then hunted with their trad bow.

I don't see the point in the tests myself.

Chad