HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - hunting over bait
View Single Post
Old 06-04-2007 | 09:19 AM
  #16  
Killer_Primate
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: hunting over bait

ORIGINAL: IL-Cornfed

Before you guys get ahead of yourselves on your anti-baiting soapbox, PLEASE read his question about what he considers "bait"?

bait as i see it is corn,green field,deer attraint,or any thing to make the deer stop and eat,or smell.
"Anything to make the deer STOP, and EAT, or SMELL. ??? This opens and broadens the topic FAR more than simply a pile of corn.

By law there is NO BAITING in my state of Illinois, however he just described 2/3 of the entire state as "baited". Ag fields, Oaks, ANY plants and native browseand even SCENT usage! I wonder what the trolls thoughts and opinions are on calling and rattling also? [&:]

That is a point of contention. According to Webster, one of the definitions of "bait" or more accurately “baiting” is "To entice or lure, esp. by trickery".

I guess that could be rattling, grunting, doe piss or whatever. I personally take the approach as if I were stuck in a time and place where I didn't have a lot of gadgets at my disposal, or dropped off in a remote place. Am I good enough? That is the question, to me. If I had a pile of corn and I was on my own, lost or living remotely, I'd probably eat it myself, not sit it on the ground for all the animals in the forest to eat, and that is how I like to approach my hunting. But I would bait similarly to how I do now. I like to shoot a doe at the opening bell of bow season and use it’s glands and urine as a lure/cover (which is bait). But I could do that in the forest alone with no stores. I think that is different than a bag of acme feed corn left on the ground.
Respectfully,
KP
Killer_Primate is offline  
Reply