HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .243or.260or.280
View Single Post
Old 01-17-2003 | 03:27 PM
  #4  
seattlesetters
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Default RE: .243or.260or.280

Of the three you mention, the .260 Rem is what I would choose. It is flat-shooting and the recoil is minimal. It will take deer cleanly to any reasonable range.

The .243 Win is a bit light for deer. It will work, but is probably better in the hands of a skilled shot. The bullets just don't weigh enough for reliable penetration.

The .280 Rem is so close to the .30-06 in felt recoil that you can pretty much eliminate that fine round.

Here is another way of looking at this, with each cartridge being measured with a "normal" bullet weight used for deer:

.243 Win/100gr/7.25lb rifle/10.2 flbs recoil

.260 Rem/120gr/7.5lb rifle/11.0 flbs recoil

7mm-08/140gr/7.5lb rifle/13.5 flbs recoil

.280 Rem/140gr/8.0lb rifle/17.2 flbs recoil

.30-06/165gr/8.0lb rifle/20.1 flbs recoil

As you can see, the .260 more closely resembles a .243 in the recoil department, and it kills much more efficiently. The 7mm-08 is also on the light side and it, too, is an incredible deer round. The .280 is indeed closer to a .30-06 in terms of felt recoil.

Based on your criteria, the .260 Rem looks like the perfect choice. I have used that round on many animals, and seen it used on many more. Every animal fairly hit with it dies quickly and with minimal tracking. <img src=icon_smile_dead.gif border=0 align=middle>




Good Dogwork and Good Hunting
seattlesetters is offline  
Reply