Chap,

The problem I have with your statement is that is respresentsme as saying somethingwhich I didn't say. But rather than say you are lying, I will say you are just being bullheaded and don't read. I never said I wouldn't have taken Mike's shot, I never said it was pathetic and irresponsible. I told you twice to re-read what I wrotewhich clearly described shot placement different than that chosen by Mike.

Whether I would have taken the shot Mike took isn't at issue and I have made no statements regarding it. It boils down to this, people who take responsible shots, don't lose game no matter what projectile they use.

Rather than making this a Mike vs Phil character assasination, why don't you recognize it for what it is. Its about real world experience with projectiles or the lack of it. So I poked fun at the post, and I made a statement about whose experience I would rely on. I trust that Mike is man enough to take the ribbing and has the integrityto admit, as I did regarding T/C, that he shouldn't be advising on somethinghe hasn't personally experienced.

As for you, I suggest that you follow the "GOOD BOOK" you are always preaching from here. Go back, re-read the posts, and stop making false judgements and making false statements about what I have written. And when you have done that, I would behappy to accept your apology and let the bygones be gone.

As far as projectile choice, "there is no magic bullet". Where do you suppose that little phrase came from? Fact is, they will all do the job if placed responsibly. If we spent more time discussing the subleties of shot placement, there would certainly be more success in the field.