"[/align][/align][/align]

Torque reducing design promotes tighter arrow grouping."[/align][/align]This is a statement from the TorqueLess grip webpage. When you first look at their information, you think that the grip eliminates torque. It cannot and does not eliminate torque.[/align][/align]What if does is the same thing that is now being done by many bow manufacturers. They are producing more narrow and smallergrips which automatically reduces the ability to 'grip' the bow - ie: reducing the possibility of bow torque.[/align][/align]Now to the Vanhandle grip. This has a muchbetter chance of torque reduction because it has a pivoting capability as I understand it. Again, I doubt very much if the claims for total torque reduction could be accomplished. To do this the pivoting would have to much more extreme than what is shown in the pictures. Torque reduction on this item, possible. Torque elimination for those who really 'grip' a bow, doubtful.[/align]






[/align][/align]IMPO, both of these products will find a better market in bows using the Mathews style grips. Bows using the BowTech style grips would be a much harder sell; however,some may find slight advantages.[/align][/align]With the 'neutral' grip form that I teach to my customers, I personallydon't seemuch of a need for such aftermarket grips. Elimination of lefts and rights is not a big issue here and correcting something that is not reallyan issue is not worth the trouble or money.[/align][/align]