HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Who said that physics wasn't fun?
View Single Post
Old 04-16-2007 | 10:43 AM
  #302  
Straightarrow
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Who said that physics wasn't fun?

ORIGINAL: davepjr71

Are you honestly trying to say that an arrow has to be over 650 gr to break bone?
I'm saying that there is significant evidence that it takes approximately 650 grains to break heavy bone.

I gurantee that my arrow is just as "deadly" as one weighing 650 grains.
And I'll guarantee it isn't.


Furthermore, it sounds as if you are saying that 650 gr should be the minimum, not 400?
I don't know why it sounds that way. I didn't say that, didn't suggest that or even mention the word minimum.


Bottom line is that many of these wounded animals are the result of the guy/girl behind the bow taking a piss poor shot to begin with. It had nothing to do with the equipment at all. However, we have to ignore the fact that even if they used a bazuka they'd still mess-up.
See, you think if a person uses a bazooka and doesn't hit what he's aiming at, that he doesn't have a better chance. I on the other hand, know that that person has a better chance of success if he misses his target while using a bazooka.
Straightarrow is offline  
Reply