HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Who said that physics wasn't fun?
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2007 | 06:07 PM
  #264  
davepjr71's Avatar
davepjr71
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
From: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
Default RE: Who said that physics wasn't fun?

ORIGINAL: TFOX


NOT IMPOSSIBLE


I believe I used a FMJ for one and an ACC for another.The spine deflection for both was very close.


An Easton aluminum 2115 has a spine deflection of .462 and a total weight with my setup of 433 grains


An Easton redline 460 has a spine deflection of .460 and a total weight of 334 grains.

Right at 100 grain difference with almost identical spine deflection and both spine perfectly for my bow.


This is using the same insert weights and fletching.I didn't feel changing the insert weight was necessary to show the comparison of spine.The aluminum shafts would be even heavier if I changed that.



When I was talking about broadheads,I was referring to the large cut expandables,they are designed for massive damage,NOT penetration.I have a lower energy setup and therefore,I utilize heads that have penetration more in mind,smaller cut.

My daughter uses 2 blade heads that are the best for penetration but don't do as much damage.
I was being sarcastic towards others that said you can't do that. I know you can.
davepjr71 is offline  
Reply