No....but we're not talking about the typical "weekend warrior" in my correlation, either. We're talkingscratch (or BETTER)golfers pitted against championship set-ups. I used the control group I did (i.e. golf) for a reason. They're the BEST players in my club and my state. They're not guys who shoot an "occasional" round in the 70's. They're guys who shoot CONSISTENT rounds AT or below par. In other words....they're thebest golfers in their respective arenas. I can tell you from experience.....they'll utilize the BEST equipment available to them. Can they shoot good rounds with a lesser ball? Sure. Can they play their BEST with that same ball? Nope. Not CONSISTENTLY.

Will there be the occasional guy playing in a state Am. or PGA event that utilizes the cheaper ball?Yes. On average, though......you don't see it happening (check the ball count for ANY PGA event or state Am. and get back with me).

There's a guy in my town that won the state Am. playing with 8 clubs and wearing hiking sneakers. John's aMAGNIFICENT golfer, though.....and (in my opinion) does this to get in hisopponent's heads (He was also part of WFU's national championship team). I just don't see the MAJORITY (not even close) of serious archery enthusiasts utilizing a WB. I dont think they see the benefits as being something important to them (full arrow containment). Besides this claim to fame......WHY else would you choose this rest over a fall-away?

Can this rest consistently take animals? Sure. So can a spear in the right hands. As with ANY piece of hunting (or any other) equipment, though.....we weigh the positives and the negatives when choosing what we want to utilize (even $$ being a consideration to some). The best 3D shooters and the best hunters "I" know utilize what they do for a reason, I'm betting. I just don't see many of the people I cite utilizing the WB.

Coincidence?