ORIGINAL: njbuck22
New61375, im not trying to get an arguement here, but state laws, common hunting practices and the like, set aside. If both pieces of property are not high fenced, neither restrict game- they are free to come and go as they want. Whats the difference? Does it make it different that there are nonnative species on it?
Once again, im not trying to instigate anything here, just trying to look at the same topic from a different view.
Sorry annmarie that this is stealing from your original post.
The original post was not about any of this so I too apoligize in advance but NJ you can't set those things aside because those things are the differences and lead to many other differences. The fence is not needed to restrict game, their movementson many of these type ranches are manipulated by food and water, yes they can leave but why would they if they have food, water, and adequate shelter. Just my opinion and I do understand what you mean when you ask what the difference is but each area is different and sometimes what people do in acertain area/region is frowned upon in other areas/regions, I'm not saying that it's right, I'm just saying. Anyway, I really have no dog in this fight and my hijacking is now over, sorry again.