Bigbulls is exactly right, you will never see anything of the sort because it would only hurt them..........and why would they bother when their money is much better spent dressing up some TV hunters and paying them to repeat their marketing mantra over big dead deer.

Science doesn't lie........the periodic table doesn't change.........and the laws of chemistry and physics remain constant and true. Of course none of this matters if you have a large group of people who are not educated enough (in science) to know better and/or are willing to accept and believe what they are told no matter how much factual evidence exists to the contrary.

The unfortunate truth is that (IMO) well over 90% of carbon suit users don't have the faintest idea of how it is supposed to work.......they just hope it does (much like many other hunting products) because the upside promise is more and bigger deer (much like other hunting products) and the downside is it's nothing more then expensive camo.......at least it will still work for something. They have no choice but to believe SOMEONE because they simply don't know any better (and that's no insult, just the truth)........and when they get cornered in threads like these they don't know what else to do but stick by the marketing spiel........because as mentioned earlier they just don't know enough about it to really discuss it and they already own the suit so they don't want to admit they made a mistake.

You shouldn't have to "believe" in a product........it should do what is says.

If someone buys a new Guardian and Bowtech says it will shoot 310fps but when sent through the chrono (same specs) it only shot 250 fps I doubt they (or anyone else) would say "Well, hey......it's still a bow right" or if you bought a treestand that said it weighed 14lbs but when you put it on the scale it hit 25lbs how many people would blow that off and say "It's still a treestand"........This is where the logic of "It's still good camo" falls apart.