ORIGINAL: GMMAT
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
I wish I'd been around to answer this the FIRST time it was asked......because the answer is quite simple. You reference a "significant" level. Here's the key to the whole DISCUSSION.
It all boils down to your interpretation of whats "significant" to YOU. If it helps me 10%......that's "significant", TO ME (unless you're claiming that regeneration is not possible to ANY degree).
Sooooooo.....like I've always said.....it ALL boils down to $$. Unless you're telling me that regeneration is NOT POSSIBLE AT ANY LEVEL......then you're really saying you're not willing to spend the extra $$ for (_____%) increase in scent control.
So which is it? It's either:
A) I'm not willing to spend the extra $$ for (_____%) increase in scent control.
or
B) Regeneration is NOT possible....to ANY degree.
So I'll ask the naysayers.......which is it....A) or B)?
A. It is not money for me; remember my $600 Gray Wolf Woolens order.
B. I have NEVER read anywhere on on carbon knowledge info that carbon can INDEED be reactivated/regenerated/desorbed to any reabsorbing abilities EXCEPT on the carbon clothes advertising. Give us proof that some desorbing/reactivation,regeneration CAN IN FACT take place in a low temperature homeowners dryer. These carbon company clothing manufacturers need to have three scientist give us unbiased reports on these carbon clothing manufacturers' claims of low heat regeneration/reactivation/desorbing. Give the scientists names and credentials to back up this statement of being able to be reactivated/regenerated/desorbed in a homeowners low heat dryer. The companies that specialize in carbon reactivation state that it requires 1500 degree heat and steam in specializedfacilitiesand the carbon clothing companies claim 140 degreesin a dryer at home. Do you see NOW why we have a hard time buying the whole advertising campaign from the clothing makers? Are we SUPPOSSED to be BELIEVE the marketing campaign and ignore the facts that we read about carbon? Are we ridiculous to want answers? It is NOT ABOUT MONEY for me, I WANT ANSWERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!