ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
Hardly disgruntled, but you must grasp at what you can.
Then what IS disgruntled??.......a bunch of guys saying they could not tell the difference between when they wore the suit and when they didn't doesn't sound like satisifed customers to me.
You say anecdotal evidence is worthless but you want to post that 10 out of 24 posters arent' raving about it. What a joke.
Because that's all you will discuss........I offer you scientific evidence repeatedly and you respond with stories and "faith"..........you don't want to discuss anything real.......just stories that support your "faith"
You couldn't carry Chucks' quiver.
You could? 
I gave you examples, you don't want to accept the truth. I figured as much.
What examples??........what truth? You have NEVER offered even one shred of evidence to support your "faith" other then stories of more deer sightings. At EVERY instance where you are confronted with scientific proof you conveniently skip them and try to change the subject. Show me and everyone else where in this thread you have offered ANYTHING scientific to back up your blind "faith" claims. All you post is pictures of Chuck, articles from magazines and websites with no connection whatsoever to anything factual.
I'm not obsessed with carbon, as you are. I only want others to know the truth. New people come on here all the time and when they see yours and others posts, although the rest of us have seen it for years, they don't know better.
You are the one following other members around and keeping track of their comments so you can monitor their posting later on and keep tabs on them.
What truth are you offering aero??..........that you don't believe in science??........that no matter what evidence piles up to the contrary you will insist that your suit magically makes you invisible to a deer's nose?
When someone posts they own the clothing are presenting that they have tried it when they actually haven't, I think people should know that. Obviously, those aren't important to you. I figured that, too.
No one's "stories" are important to me.......for every one there is another that will say the opposite. Save yourself the time and effort of following other members around and being the carbon watch dog and just forget them all...........now you know why FACTUAL evidence and not hearsay is all that is allowed in court.
No. You don't try to discuss anything. You provide the same technical data that's been floating around for years and DOES NOT PROVE THAT THE CLOTHING CAN OR CANNOT do as its advertised.
Nothing will ever prove it to you aero............I suggest you go buy a chemistry and physics book or sign up for some classes at the local Univ and you will get all the proof you need. Even then I'm sure you won't believe it because Chuck Adams didn't write the periodic table.