ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
I would hardly classify those as complaints. If that's as bad of complaints as you can come up with I can certainly see why carbon clothing enjoys such success.
Yea...........a bunch of guys saying that they used it and couldn't notice a difference between when they did and didn't is really a ringing endorsement.............that's the worst complaint there could be......after all, you have already stated carbon clothing is the key to seeing and killing more mature deer...........I guess all these people disagree with your "faith"
Yes, I know I'm right. You don't care. Pretty convenient. You question me about the validity of some of the posters claims but when you see the truth you "don't care". It's not keeping track, it's called paying attention.
You can try to twist my words as much as you want.........you claimed earlier that me and others are obsessed about this topic and then clearly displayed that you are the one with the "woody" over it by monitoring and keeping track of other members comments.......I don't care about this topic enough to spy on other members. I know the truth and simply point it out........in factual evidence (something you have NEVER done). That is why anecdotal evidence is useless. EVERY "story" about a suit could be a lie (yours included)...........that's why I don't care about them.......you want to use them as your sole evidence so I try to show you that for every story like yours there is one in the other direction.......if one person or everyone is lying only further illustrates my point why "stories" don't matter and science does...........even if your posterboy Chuck is telling it.
You slam REAL USERS because they tell their true, positive experiences then want to cite NON USERS testimonials, then say you don't care when presented with the truth.
What "truth" aero??.........that you think some kid on his parents PC is lying because you have been monitoring him and keeping track of what he says??.........that is all you have to offer as the "truth"? 
I have tried to discuss the topic with you MANY times based on nothing other then science and you are unable or unwilling to do that so YOU resort to "stories" about a deer down wind and pictures of Chuck Adams.