HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Most Under Rated Bow
View Single Post
Old 03-14-2007 | 05:08 PM
  #27  
Buck Magnet's Avatar
Buck Magnet
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,656
Likes: 0
From: Indiana PA USA
Default RE: Most Under Rated Bow

I had a Browning Tornado and I had nothing but problems. Why do you say it was a heck of a bow?
Well, he owned the bow for a few seasons and never had any problems with it, but then again, he took very good care of it. The bow was every bit as accurate as the BowTech he replaced it with and it didn't have any problems killing the deer and turkey he shot with it. For the money it was a very nice bow, good construction, some nice features (such as the large amount of draw length adjustment), it was pretty smooth and didn't have alot of noise or handshock. It did everything that a "top" bow would do at half the price.

I could shoot any compound bow on the market right now and still plenty efficent to kill an animal and I would enjoy shooting the bow no matter how much noise/handshock/striff D.F.C. I just flat out enjoy shooting bows. I shoot a top end BowTech.. Why you may ask, because I could afford it and I liked it. If I didn't have the money to drop on it, I could still have as much fun shooting a PSE Nova. Too many people get caught up in the "you have to get a top end bow" theory and its just not true. Like I said, I shoot a "top end" bow but I would never say that you "have to have one". Every bow out there today, no matter if it cost $1,000 or $100 will only be as accurate as the person behind it.
Buck Magnet is offline  
Reply